Homedisinformation in the worldMain news

Liars Want to Verify Those Who Tell the Truth  

The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), established in 2015 by the  American Poynter Institute for Media Studies, is a global initiative dedicated  to supporting and developing the community of fact-checkers worldwide in  their fight against disinformation. Recognising the credibility of the IFCN,  Russian propagandists sought to exploit this trust by creating the Russian  Global Fact-Checking Network in April 2025.

Death Camps Were Not Located in Poland
This time, they’ve fabricated a story about 20,000 NATO soldiers.
Putin the Disinformer: How an Alpha  Male Became a Pious Christian  

The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), established in 2015 by the  American Poynter Institute for Media Studies, is a global initiative dedicated  to supporting and growing the fact-checking community worldwide in its  efforts to combat disinformation. To this end, the IFCN’s code of principles  mandates impartiality, transparent sourcing, and funding disclosure. In  Poland, demagog.org.pl, pravda.org.pl, and FakeNews.pl all boast IFCN  certification.

Further information about the IFCN can be found at poynter.org/ifcn.

Russian propagandists have now sought to exploit the credibility of the  International Fact-Checking Network by creating the Russian Global Fact Checking Network in April 2025. According to Maria Zakharova,  spokesperson for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this platform  “brings together experts engaged in exposing false information” and “is  essentially an international portal that fosters an honest and open approach  to fact-checking” (https://tass.ru/obschestvo/23637979).

She also claimed that “more than 30 foreign journalists and investigators  from 30 countries: Australia, Brazil, the Netherlands, Portugal, France, Spain,  Nigeria, Pakistan, Indonesia, Singapore, and others” are participating in this  initiative. One of them is (listed first) Australian academic Tim Anderson,  known for his left-leaning views.

For instance, in his article “Lenin, Ireland and Palestine”, Anderson wrote:

„On the hundredth anniversary of the passing of Lenin, we should remember  the passing of one of history’s few figures to not only overthrow an old order  but to transform egalitarian ideals into a new society. It would be a mistake, if  not a sin, to ignore the many practical lessons of his life. However, it would be  an even greater sin to read Lenin’s largely historical analysis as dogma or a  blueprint from which to chart the future. He was a writer of his times”  (https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/opinion/lenin–ireland-and-palestine).

In another artcile, ”The Russian SMO (1): was it an Imperial intervention?,”  Anderson argued:

„That will remain a matter for historians. However the charge that the  Russian intervention was an imperial operation fails because: (1) it did not  aim to impose foreign rule, being rather a pre-emptive response to NATO  expansion, plus a response to calls for protection from the mostly Russian  people of SE Ukraine, suffering siege and aggression from the Kiev regime” (https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/the-russian-smo–1—was-it-an-imperial-intervention)

However, perhaps the most astonishing and deceitful is Anderson’s opinion  regarding the Russian atrocities in Bucha. In his article, Anderson references  the UN vote to exclude Russia from the Human Rights Council:

„That third motion was based on the massacre of civilians in Bucha, which the  US-led bloc blamed on Russia, but which was most likely a false flag  operation. Many of the civilians killed, after a Russian withdrawal from an  area near Kiev, were wearing white armbands, a sign of surrender to or  sympathy with the Russians. Evidence strongly suggests they were killed by  Ukrainian ultra-nationalists, notorious for their reprisals against “traitors”,  for their “collaboration” with Russia (Reif 2022; Tuteja 2022)” (https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/the-russian-smo–2—why-was-it-a-global-turning-point).

By: ih

The town of Bucha, located outside Kyiv, has become the most prominent  symbol of Russian atrocities in Ukraine. Occupied by the Russian army and  later reclaimed by Ukrainian forces in the spring of 2022, it was the site of  mass graves containing over 200 civilians, as well as bodies left lying in the  streets. Russia has claimed that the bodies only appeared after Ukrainian  soldiers entered the liberated areas.

However, The New York Times, citing satellite images taken by Maxar  Technologies, refuted these claims. The images show that bodies had been  lying in the streets from at least 11 March, while the first image of the trench  containing the mass grave dates back to 10 March, when the town was still  under Russian occupation. This was also confirmed by CNN in its reporting:

Exclusive: New drone video shows Russian military vehicles and forces on Bucha street strewn with civilian bodies

ih

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 0
DISQUS: